In late 2012, when the American film director Christopher Nolan formally took over the production of a Warner Brothers science-fiction project that had been drifting through Hollywood development since approximately 2005 (originally intended for Steven Spielberg, based on a screenplay concept the film producer Lynda Obst had developed jointly with the Caltech theoretical physicist Kip Thorne across the middle years of the 2000s), Nolan inherited alongside the underlying script a specific technical arrangement that essentially none of the previous Hollywood science-fiction productions in the recorded history of the American film industry had operated under: the executive producer and formal scientific consultant on the film — a physicist who would ultimately be given contractual authority to review and (within reason) veto specific visual and narrative elements of the completed film on the specific grounds of physical accuracy — was the same Kip Stephen Thorne who was, at that specific moment in the professional history of American theoretical physics, one of the substantially most senior living authorities on the general relativistic behaviour of black holes, and who would, three years after the film’s November 2014 release, share the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics with his LIGO collaborators Rainer Weiss and Barry Barish for the substantially separate 40-year research programme that had produced the September 2015 first-ever detection of gravitational waves.
The single most-scientifically-accurate visualisation of a spinning black hole ever produced by any human institution up to that point in the recorded history of astrophysical visualisation was produced not by a research observatory or a university physics department but by a Hollywood visual effects company working under the direction of a Caltech theoretical physicist for a Christopher Nolan science-fiction film. The specific technical problem that Thorne and his industrial collaborators encountered in late 2013, when they began work on the specific black hole visualisation sequence that would eventually become one of the substantially most iconic visual images of the completed film, was that no existing computer graphics rendering software could adequately handle the specific physics required for a realistic depiction of light behaviour near a rapidly-spinning supermassive black hole. The problem is that light near a black hole does not travel in straight lines. It follows the curved geodesics of the general relativistic spacetime that the black hole’s mass produces — meaning that the specific visual appearance of any object (an accretion disk, a background star field, another astronomical body) located in the vicinity of a black hole depends on the specific way in which the light emitted by that object has been progressively bent, redshifted, and (in the case of a rapidly spinning black hole) frame-dragged by the underlying spacetime geometry between the source and the observer’s eye.
As detailed in Astronomy Magazine’s technical reconstruction of Kip Thorne’s specific scientific contributions to the Interstellar production, the specific solution that Thorne and Oliver James — the chief scientist at Double Negative, the London-based visual effects company Nolan had contracted for the Interstellar production — developed across 2013-2014 was a new general-relativistic ray-tracing method that abandoned the standard point-sampling techniques used by essentially every prior computer-graphics rendering system in favour of a beam-based approach in which bundles of adjacent light rays were traced simultaneously through the curved spacetime around the black hole. The resulting rendering software, which Double Negative called DNGR (Double Negative Gravitational Renderer), consumed approximately 800 terabytes of data across the production of the film, required rendering times of up to 100 hours per individual frame at the highest resolution settings, and produced the substantially most physically accurate visual depiction of a spinning supermassive black hole that any human observer had ever seen up to that point in the recorded history of astronomical imaging. The fictional black hole in the film, which the screenplay named “Gargantua” and specified as a supermassive black hole of approximately 100 million solar masses spinning at approximately 99.8 percent of its theoretical maximum angular momentum, exhibited the specific set of visual features that general relativity had predicted for such a body but that no prior visualisation had adequately captured: a central shadow, a bright photon sphere immediately around the shadow, and a warped accretion disk that appeared to simultaneously surround the black hole in the equatorial plane while also appearing above and below the plane as a consequence of the gravitational lensing bending the disk’s own light back toward the viewer.
The two papers that came out of the film
The specific scientific novelty of what Thorne, James, and their Double Negative collaborators had produced was, by the standards of contemporary astrophysical visualisation research, substantially non-trivial. Per Interesting Engineering’s summary of Thorne’s specific contributions to the Interstellar production and its subsequent scientific outputs, the same computational methods that had produced the Gargantua visualisation for the film were, in early 2015, formally submitted to two separate peer-reviewed physics journals as substantive scientific research. The first paper, titled “Gravitational lensing by spinning black holes in astrophysics, and in the movie Interstellar,” authored by Oliver James, Eugénie von Tunzelmann, Paul Franklin (the Double Negative visual effects supervisor who had directly won the 2014 Academy Award for Best Visual Effects for Interstellar), and Kip S. Thorne, was published in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity in February 2015. The paper explained the specific computational methodology the Double Negative team had developed, presented the specific new astrophysical insights that the visualisation had revealed (including the specific ways in which a spinning black hole’s accretion disk would appear to a nearby observer), and provided the scientific community with the specific mathematical framework required to reproduce the visualisation. The second paper, titled “Visualizing Interstellar’s Wormhole,” by the same four authors, was published in the American Journal of Physics in June 2015 and addressed the specific rendering methods used for the separate wormhole sequence at the beginning of the film. Both papers passed peer review without substantial revision.
What the black hole actually looked like
The single most substantive external validation of the Interstellar visualisation’s scientific accuracy arrived approximately four and a half years after the film’s release. As reported in Time Magazine’s coverage of Kip Thorne’s professional trajectory across the Interstellar production and the subsequent 2017 Nobel Prize, on 10 April 2019, the international Event Horizon Telescope consortium — a collaboration of eight radio telescopes at six geographic locations spanning four continents, jointly synthesised into a single Earth-sized virtual radio telescope through the technique of very-long-baseline interferometry — released the first direct astronomical image of a supermassive black hole (specifically the central black hole of the galaxy Messier 87, approximately 6.5 billion solar masses, located approximately 53 million light-years from Earth). The resulting image showed a central dark shadow, a bright photon sphere immediately around the shadow, and a warped accretion structure — essentially every substantive visual feature that Thorne, James, and the Double Negative team had predicted in their 2014 Interstellar visualisation. The specific comparison between the film’s fictional Gargantua and the real astronomical image of M87’s central black hole subsequently became one of the more substantial single validations of general relativity’s predictive accuracy across the past century of theoretical physics — and one of the more substantial single demonstrations of what modern Hollywood visual effects can accomplish when the specific technical requirements of narrative filmmaking are aligned with the specific technical requirements of astrophysical research. As Thorne himself observed in his official 2017 Nobel Prize interview with the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the methods that he and Oliver James had developed for the film “are now being used by astrophysicists as part of their visualization of simulations they do of things like black holes and accretion discs around black holes and neutron stars” — meaning that the specific research tools that Nolan’s 2014 science-fiction film required to produce its visual effects have, across the subsequent decade, been progressively adopted by the same academic astrophysical community whose specific theoretical work the film’s specific visual accuracy was itself extending.
The post For the 2014 film Interstellar, director Christopher Nolan hired Caltech physicist Kip Thorne as his science consultant — and the visual simulations Thorne helped design for the film’s black hole were so mathematically accurate that they generated two peer-reviewed scientific papers and became the model for how astrophysicists visualize black holes today appeared first on Space Daily.